Black (or White?) History Month

14 Sep

The month of February 2011 is widely celebrated as Black History month in the United States. The celebration often transcends the domestic shores of its country of origin to gain widespread recognition and media coverage in other Western and non-Western nations.

Although termed Black History Month, the celebration in focuses on the achievements of the erstwhile enslaved people of black Africa in the United States. Dr. Carter G. Woodson, the son of former slaves who went on to earn a doctorate degree from Harvard University, laid the foundation for the marking of Black History month. After he noticed the absence of any form of history of black people in teaching and in academic discourse, Dr. Carter made a case in 1926 for a Negro History Week, which later became the Black History Month. 

The caption, Black History Month, is likely to confuse the historian, out in search of authentic African history dating back millennia. However, it is commonly accepted in the United States that the word “Black” means strictly speaking,  African-Americans. In essence, Black History Month celebrations are concerned with the exposition of the achievements of African-American former slaves within the ambit of their former colonial masters. Outside the coast of the United States therefore, this interpretation and celebration of Black history can be adjudged a misnomer.  This is because Black to most people around the world means African, and African history means the story of the people who lived in the continent in times past.

It is disconcerting and disturbs the African’s mind, that the history of “Blackness” in the world’s intellectual and media capital, the United States is associated with white domination, oppression, repression and slavery. It is a history, dictated by the West, one that late Prof Hugh Trevor Roper of Oxford University would validate with his statement in 1965 that there is no African history, but only the history of Europeans in Africa, “the rest is darkness… and darkness is not a subject for history.”

The celebration of Black History Month without laying the major emphasis on pre-slavery, pre-colonial Africa, and on the myriad of achievements of continental Africans/ Blacks of that era is indicative that most Black scholars and historians are still submerged in the Western historical point of view of history.  His-story: the story of the white Caucasian male as told by him or from his point of view. His-story of enslavement of the Africans and dragging them to his territory. His-story of granting them freedom after only a certain number of years as slaves. His-story of the achievements he has so magnanimously allowed their most illustrious sons and daughters to accomplish, despite their lowly past. His-story of how the former slave has leveraged on the White man’s education to become the first “African-American” to ride a car, a plane or train. In all, Black History month allows Africans to tell their “his-story” starting only from the period when they set foot on the enslaver’s soil and became subjected to his “civilizing” efforts.

Slavery was calculated to capture the memory of the enslaved, such that even after freedom has been granted, he is already inherently configured to think like a slave. The physical un-cuffing of chains does not in any way free the mind from the years of calculated and intense mental subjugation. Ngugi Wa Thiongo, captures it so succinctly when he notes; “but cultural subjugation is more dangerous, because it is more subtle and its effects, long lasting. Moreover, it can make a person who has lost his land, who feels the pangs of hunger, who carries flagellated flesh, to look at those experiences differently… he or she has been drained of historical memory of a different world.”

Black History Month at the moment, rather than advancing the study of authentic Africa  is bound by the myopia of African interaction with the West.  Paulo Freire would argue that this form of history “is well suited to the purposes of the oppressors, whose tranquility rests on how well men fit the world the oppressors have created, and how little they question it.”

The same his-story is taught in African schools. Pupils in Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC) are taught that Henry Stanley Morton was the first European to navigate the river’s length. Little is taught to the students about the powerful kingdom of the Kongo people, who lived, traded and traveled by the river for thousands of years before Henry  Morton Stanley. DRC pupils know more about Belgium and King Leopold than the Manikongo and BaKongo. Such examples thrive all across formerly colonized black Africa.

Mahatma Ghandi much more than fighting for the independence of India from the British, insisted on the mental decolonization of the Indian. In his seminal work, Towards New Education, Ghandi asserts that “the curriculum and pedagogic ideas which form the fabric of modern education (in India) were imported from Oxford and Cambridge, Edinburgh and London. But they are essentially foreign, and till they are repudiated, there never can be national education.”

Education to be considered sound must be able to ensure continuity from one generation to another. No generation, should due to education, loose touch of the investments, knowledge bank and core values of its predecessors.

For Africa, decolonization of the curriculum with emphasis on history must be embarked upon as matter of urgency. People of African descent, resident and in the Diaspora must seek to know their age old authentic history through conscientious research, archeological excavations, cultural and linguistic analysis and a deconstruction of the his-story bequeathed by the racially motivated scholarship of the Victorian era.

As a matter of urgency, Black History Month, while duly acknowledging the innumerable contributions of people of African descent in the United States, must liberate itself from the territorial narrowness in which it is presently embedded. African history and contributions to ‘global civilization’ – dating back to as far as ancient Egypt – must be studied and disseminated to the rest of humanity.

Dreams, desires and innate expectations of men are founded on the memories they hold.  The despicable political and economic situation of the black race – regardless of their place of abode – is founded on a lack of aspiration due to absence of positive consciousness.  This must be reversed for advancement to be made across sectors. Ngugi Wa Thiongo states the antidote to this situation so brilliantly; “Black consciousness then becomes the right of black peoples to draw an image of themselves that negates and transcends the image of themselves that was drawn by those who would weaken them in their fight for and assertion of their humanity… It seeks to draw the image of a possible world, different and transcending the one drawn by the West by reconnecting itself to a different historical memory and dreams…”

For progress of any measure to be recorded among people of African descent within and outside the continent, there is need to embark on the research, dissemination and identifation of authentic African history. Africa’s past is not darkness, it is only dark to those who do not see it.

Creativity and innovation are products of a positive self image, an attribute which most Africans are currently not manifesting.  Positive self-image is an offshoot of knowledge. For Africans, knowledge of the positive, independent and unencumbered contributions of their forefathers to humanity, would definitely unleash the latent creative energies of the living protégés.

First published February, 2011 by Pambazuka News


Posted by on September 14, 2011 in Essays


Tags: , , , , , , , , , , ,

3 responses to “Black (or White?) History Month

  1. Chinue X

    January 29, 2012 at 6:11 pm

    I would like to extend an invitation for you to a speak on this subject matter of great concern to African People! Are you available? Asante Sana.

  2. kznwatch

    April 18, 2016 at 7:18 pm

    While speaking in gross ignorance on whether African history projects have long since been established in individual African states, I am asking whether, 1) such projects, originated in Africa and essentially are African born projects, headed by African historians and writers and 2) are text books of authentic African history already available for students from grade nought through to grade 12 and beyond, available at tertiary institutions via the department of education of each state?

    I stumbled on this site purely by chance and how it happened is almost a miracle for me, as I have searched for South African sites, where serious discussions on the most sensitive issues are openly and honestly addressed and discussed. Furthermore, it was really amazing, as the subject of my search, was:- “why do south africa’s gold and diamond mines still belong to massive global corporations?” My eyes alighted on your, “Towards Ending Apartheid in South African Mines” and I just had to click on it.

    You touch on deeply thought provoking issues on this site, which cannot but affect and touch all true blue South Africans to the heart, as our country, along with so many other African states continue to be “hi-jacked” by mainly western big corps. As a white South African it cuts to the quick that South Africa, after 21 Years is still not a sovereign country … still held captive by western imperialism.

    I will come back here tomorrow and look forward to exploring your site and drinking it all in. Thank you for reading my comment. Cannot believe that this site is not flooded with comments from back to front! — It is a jewel!

    • chikaforafrica

      April 18, 2016 at 10:11 pm

      Thank you very much for stopping-by.

      Few African countries are actively exploring and promoting research and teaching of authentic African history as a pathway to real Independence and advancement. Science and technology are presently being actively promoted, and not to underestimate the importance of those, but if history and the humanities continue to be ignored then the current emphasis on science and technology will lead to even greater dependency of Africa on external actors, an attitude that has historically not yielded much benefit to the continent. History is not a “lucrative” field of study and in the ultra-capitalist world in which Africa is allowing itself to be fully swept into, what matters most is the short term rate-of-return as determined quantitatively.

      The fact that enduring societies are built by deep, broad based thinkers is lost on many African countries, especially since the research and education agenda on the continent is mostly financed by the global North. Scientists are desperately needed in Africa, but what Africa needs are real, independent scientists who understand where Africa is coming from, where it is currently, and where it should be headed towards. There is need to train a core of citizenry who are committed to exploring and searching out the indigenous resources of the continent and building on those – and borrowing ideas, of course, where necessary – to create what Africa and the rest of the world are searching for.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: